Synapsed AI Governance Framework

Research / AI Frameworks / Governance

Make governance part
of how AI is built.

The Synapsed AI Governance Framework connects the decisions an organisation needs to make with the work required to carry them out. Responsibilities, lifecycle activities, controls and evidence form one operating model.

Conceptual layers linked by illuminated paths, representing connected research methods.
Four connected elements

Make each decision actionable and reviewable.

  1. Responsibilities

    Identify who makes a decision, implements the work and reviews the outcome. Connect product, governance, engineering and assurance roles.

    Ask: who owns the decision and who needs to be involved?

  2. Lifecycle activities

    Place governance activities where they can influence the AI system, from defining its purpose through maintaining it in operation.

    Ask: what needs to happen before the next step?

  3. Controls

    Translate the intended boundaries and relevant requirements into technical and operational measures.

    Ask: how is the expectation implemented in this system?

  4. Evidence

    Identify the records, test results and observations needed to review implementation and support the next decision.

    Ask: what supports the conclusion, and what remains unresolved?

Lifecycle integration

Connect governance to delivery and change.

Illustrative application of the lifecycle approach informed by Synapsed’s AI-T-SDLC research.
StageQuestions to resolveExamples of evidence
DefineWhat is the intended use? Who is responsible? Which impacts and requirements need attention?Agreed scope, ownership, initial assessments and requirement decisions.
DesignHow will the system meet its requirements and stay within its boundaries?Design decisions, threat models and planned controls.
DevelopHow are the chosen controls implemented and reviewed?Implementation records, reviews and test evidence.
DeployWhat supports the release decision? Which limitations or issues remain?Validation results, accepted issues, approvals and operating instructions.
MaintainWhat has changed, and what needs to be reassessed?Monitoring, incidents, repeated tests and reviewed change decisions.
Illustrative example

Follow an access boundary through a RAG application.

An internal knowledge assistant should only use information the requesting user is authorised to access. Governance connects that expectation to delivery and review.

  1. Assign ownership

    The product and data owners define the access boundary, the information classes and who can approve a change.

  2. Implement and test

    The engineering team applies controls across retrieval and response generation. Tests examine whether users can obtain information outside their permissions.

  3. Review and revisit

    The team records test conditions, observations and unresolved issues. Changes to sources, permissions or components trigger a review of the relevant evidence.

The framework in practice

Connect the method with its evidence.

The research application provides a concrete view of the relationship between the framework, lifecycle activities and evidence. The screenshot below shows an example working state.

Synapsed governance research application showing lifecycle alignment, baselines and evidence navigation.
Original screenshot of the research application. Completion and evidence counts refer to the example shown.

Bring governance into your AI initiative.

Start from the organisation’s priorities and the AI systems it is building. We help adapt the framework to the decisions, practices and evidence your teams need.